A criticism of the principle of equivalence

von Bernhardt B. Husen

Aus dem Blog von Bernhardt B. Husen:

A criticism of the principle of equivalence

When I read about the equivalence principle of Einstein, it’s not easy to stay calm. So many words are used to explain a nonexistent equivalence, just because it makes a theory working, even though every layman is able to see that there is absolutely no equivalence, but a certain similarity ! You might as well postulate the circle is a strait line. I had some discussions with the priests of this strange religion, but they fight to
the bloody end with arguments missing logic like a nightmare and… they call everybody arguing against for a crazy crackpot, instead of activating some of their grey cells. But the prophet has spoken: There is equivalence… by the way, let there be light…  Their arguments are as follows:

Weiterlesen…

.

—————————————-
Siehe auch im Blog vom Bernhardt B. Husen:

Is Olbers paradox proof for the Big-Bang ?
Closest package of spheres in different formed containers
A proposal for corrections of Newton’s theory
The experimentally changed gravitational theory
Connecting gravitation with Niels Bohr’s theory
Gravitational collapse and supernova-explosion
The Lorentz factor

.

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort

Erlaubter XHTML-Code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>